WiTOPoli Weekly: Friday, November 14

A roundup of some of the latest news in women, Toronto, and/or politics this week. What stories did you read this week? Tell us in the comments.

  • Canadians united on social media to protest the arrival of “pick-up artist”Julien Blanc and urge Canada’s immigration minister to block him from entering the country. Blanc, who sells “dating” seminars around the world for up to $2500 a class, teaches men how to violate women through physical and emotional abuse including choking, drugging their drinks, and “just grabbing” them. More than 2,300 Canadians have signed the petition, and the hashtag #KeepJulienBlancOutofCanada has been used by an additional 1,400 people. Canada’s Minister of Citizenship and Immigration responded to the social media campaign, saying that he is “looking at all options and will consider using every tool at our disposal to protect the rule of law on Canadian soil.”
  • Two very powerful Canadian women met for the first time on November 5 in Ottawa. Canada’s Health Minister Rona Ambrose met with 15-year-old activist RachelParent, who has been challenging Ms. Ambrose to discuss the labelling of genetically modified food for over a year. Despite warm sentiments expressed by both women, Ms. Ambrose subsequently stated that she will not be moving towards mandatory labelling as there is currently no scientific evidence that proves GMOs are unhealthy for Canadians. Meanwhile, Ms. Parent held her own press conference on Parliament Hill with MP Murray Rankin, who has introduced a motion for mandatory GMO labelling.
  • Torontonians are gearing up for this year’s What Makes A Man 2014: The White Ribbon Conference. The conference is a two-day discussion focused on redefining masculinity and creating a healthier idea of manhood. The conference will feature special guest Terry Crews, an actor, former NFL player, author of ‘Manhood’, and proud feminist, as well as talks related to Success, Mental Health, Start-Up Culture, Boyhood to Manhood, and Violence Against Women. Jian Ghomeshi, Julien Blanc, and the recent allegations of sexual harassment on Parliament Hill have together sparked a much-needed national conversation on rape culture; the What Makes A Man conference aims to translate this conversation into positive, widespread, and grassroots change.
  • Trigger Warning: Toronto women have been urged to stay safe and be cautious after an attempted abduction in Toronto’s Little Portugal neighbourhood. On Sunday November 9th, a 27-year-old woman was walking in the College Street and Brock Avenue area when a man grabbed her from behind and held a metal hacksaw to her neck. Fortunately two men nearby heard her screams and came to her aid, but police have yet to identify the suspect.
  • Toronto Life has released its annual list of Toronto’s 50 Most InfluentialPeople. There are 15 women included in the list of 50, which is a dismal 30%. Here’s hoping to at least a 50% representation next year, ladies.
Advertisements

Rob Ford and Toxic Masculinity

by Steph Guthrie (@amirightfolks)

Violent temper. Refusal to admit wrongdoing. Penchant for expressing every feeling as anger. Penchant for expressing anger through physical intimidation. Homophobia and transphobia. Impulsive, risky behaviour with no consideration of potential consequences. Obsession with the competitive parts of politics (campaigning) and disdain for the collaborative parts. “Boys will be boys” brand excuses for egregious behaviour. Yup. Toronto Mayor Rob Ford sure is winning at Toxic Masculinity Bingo.

This isn’t the first time I’ve thought about Rob Ford’s embodiment of the socially-constructed norms that shape and constrain our culture’s understanding of what it means to Be A Man. I thought about it a lot after the Mayor violently confronted journalist Daniel Dale on the property adjacent to his home, fist cocked and charging at full speed.

I thought about it after reports quoted him calling Liberal Party of Canada leader Justin Trudeau a homophobic slur. And when he asked if a transgender person was “a guy dressed up like a girl or a girl dressed up like a guy.” And when he made homophobic comments about who really contracts HIV/AIDS and whose life is really worth something at the end of the day.

I thought about it when he voted (on every occasion possible) to cut all kinds of community programs that help all kinds of children and youth, believing instead that personal support of a football program exclusively for boys was sufficient to help at-risk youth in Toronto. Boy-only football programs are great for boys who like football, but not all boys do – and there’s a whole lot of other kids out there who aren’t boys, besides.

I thought about it a lot when I launched my personal blog with a post about my suspicion that Rob Ford is a woman abuser – based on the consistent history of domestic calls to his home (including one charge that was later dropped) – which I later deleted because a handful of male non-libel lawyers said it left me vulnerable to libel suits.

But it was hard not to think about it extra-hard when a video surfaced of an inebriated Rob Ford ranting in disturbingly graphic terms about his desire to “first-degree murder” someone. He was blind with anger and the evidence poured out of his erratic movements and rhetorical violence. His explosive anger appeared to be a result of things a third party had said about him; in other words, he craved physical violence as a response to some ostensible verbal wrongdoing.

The nail in the coffin came later on when his mother sneered at a television reporter that she wouldn’t want her son, who clearly has a debilitating issue with substance abuse, “off in some rehab” – she’d prefer to focus on the size and shape of his body as the real problem. It hurt to watch. It was a painful reminder of how men are socialized to never show weakness or softness; how often a man caring for himself is perceived as unmanly, how men must be strong at all times. It said a lot about why he may have ended up in the sorry state he has.

There has been a lot of talk in Toronto this last week about enabling in the context of Rob Ford’s substance abuse, which is good, but the public writ large seems to enable his toxic masculinity. People who called Daniel Dale a wuss on Twitter for being afraid of a much-larger man approaching him violently? Enablers. People who said Ford’s “murder rant” was just the kind of murderously violent speech we all engage in when we’re a little angry? Enablers.

But then, when it comes to the replication of gender norms, most of us are enablers. Toxic masculinity is not “men being awful”; rather, it is people of all genders holding, performing and perpetuating rigid ideas of who we are allowed to be. Rob Ford, in particular, has spent a lifetime striving to perform what a Rich, Powerful White Man should be (a whole other level of toxicity beyond the merely masculine). His pursuit of idealized masculinity seems unmistakably modelled after that of his simultaneous bully and protector brother, who has often been framed by the media as “the smart one” and seems to have always been perceived as more competent, more likeable, more of A Man.

Articles imploring Rob Ford to step up to some ill-defined code of manhood do not help matters. It is not useful or accurate to frame honesty, accountability and “honour” as masculine traits, nor is it ever helpful to implore someone to “be a man.” Why not just “be a decent, trustworthy human being”? Why gender that? This kind of macho posturing only serves to validate idealized masculinity and reductive, binary understandings of how gender can and should influence identity.

Consider for a moment if a woman sharing Ford’s documented track record of physical aggression would ever have been elected Mayor of a major city. More likely she would have long ago been perceived as “unhinged” and cast out of the leadership pool in her chosen field. Yet we laud – or at least will grudgingly accept – this behaviour from a man, so much so that we elect him to a prime position of public trust. His impulsive expressions of anger are part of what endears him to so many as a ‘regular guy,’ one they could ‘have a few pops with.’ Boys will be boys, right?

If we want more gender diversity in politics, we need to understand that a) a good politician can come equipped with a wide variety of character traits, not all of them about cutthroat aggression and cold calculation, and b) there is immense diversity within genders and no trait is “naturally” masculine or feminine – we choose to understand and value traits in these binary ways, and if we want to, we can choose to change that.